Global Edition

 

Slash VAT Rates to Encourage Golf Participation

1.22am 18th March 2011 - Management Topics - This story was updated on Monday, June 27th, 2011

Colin Mayes, CEO of Burhill Golf and Leisure and Chairman of the UK Golf Course Owners Association.

The Burhill Golf and Leisure CEO is urging the Government to slash VAT rates for Golf Clubs. Colin Mayes strongly believes Whitehall should follow the lead taken by many other European countries (such as Sweden and Holland) of dropping the rate from its current 20% to around 6% – allowing sports facility owners to offer lower prices and so, potentially, attract more customers.

Ideally, Mr. Mayes would like to see the VAT rate for proprietary-run sports organisations removed on activity-based income – a benefit currently enjoyed only by private members (non-profit making) clubs.

Burhill Golf and Leisure – the UK’s leading golf course owner and operator with 10 facilities – has been forced to further raise its prices, including annual subscriptions, green fees and clubhouse provisions, following the 2.5% hike in the VAT rate introduced on January 1.

“The government should, without question, reconsider its position regarding the VAT it levies on all sports clubs,” declared Mr. Mayes.

He added: “We, in conjunction with the government, should be encouraging all the family to take part in healthy lifestyle pursuits such as golf – not putting them off with unreasonably high, VAT-influenced, prices.

“Quite simply, the unnecessary rise to 20% is a huge burden for the sports industry.”

Golf is ‘unnecessarily expensive’

The government, insisted Mr. Mayes, appears to be sending out mixed messages over the issue. “On the one hand it says it wants to avoid the UK becoming an unhealthy, obese country and encourage people to play sport – yet, on the other hand, it makes it unnecessarily expensive to play sports like golf at courses such as those in the Burhill group.

“The rise in VAT is becoming a huge burden for commercial organisations, such as Burhill Golf and Leisure, that are being forced to pass on the rise in costs to our customers. And we do not want golf to be seen as the expensive pastime that, unfortunately, it may soon become.”

Mr. Mayes also highlighted the vital role sports organisations can play in helping to boost the flagging UK economy.

“Revenue from sports activities, and sport-related tourism drawing visitors keen to play some of the world’s finest golf courses, can play a key role in achieving this – but not given the present situation,” he said. “You would hope the government would realise this. It’s very skewed thinking.”

Inequality among golf facilities

One issue that has caused much debate is the inequality among golf facilities regarding VAT – private members clubs are exempt from paying the levy while proprietary facilities are not. It’s a matter that influential golf industry body the UK Golf Course Owners Association (UKGCOA), of which Mr Mayes is Chairman, has also made comment on.

“Commercial organisations such as Burhill Golf and Leisure already pay corporation tax which private-member golf clubs do not – and this should be sufficient. But we are all sports facilities and use various income streams to maintain and improve our facilities for our customers’ benefit. Clearly the commercial clubs are losing out quite considerably.

“We have called on the government to remove this inequality, as we believe there is ultimately no difference between private-member and commercial facilities, but the status quo continues.”

A spokesman for HM Revenue & Customs has said there is insufficient evidence to justify a ‘one rule for all’ policy for golf clubs: “Whilst EU legislation would allow us to withdraw the exemption if we considered that it resulted in distortion of competition, we have never received convincing evidence that this is the case.”

One compromise, suggested Mr. Mayes, would be to maintain the current VAT level on clubhouse purchases (non-activity-related) but reduce it for green fees and annual subscriptions (activity-driven).  “The government would still claw back some tax on food and drink but demonstrate its desire to encourage people to play sport by waiving it on these particular activities.”

Burhill Golf and Leisure Ltd www.burhillgolfandleisure.co.uk

UK Golf Course Owners Association www.ukgcoa.com

       

You can see the latest news letter here.

Follow us on Twitter and LinkedIn.            
  • Could someone explain how HMRC say there is not enough eveidence?
    Surely it is a simple calculation of the input/output VAT with the evidence being apparent in the financial disadvantage?

  • May I add my approval to the movement for slashing or even removal of VAT from Golf Clubs and bookings. I can only speak about our own set up however I know that as a major attractor of visitors additional VAT sometimes is the difference between booking and not booking. When you look at additional add ons in the locality with food, beverage, retail you can imagine that there is a much bigger picture here. Good luck to all those involved in driving this initiative and you have Carnoustie’s endorsement.

  • I totally agree with all of the comments made so far. How can the HMRC say there is no evidence. Golf is a sport just like any other and as a result VAT should not be applicable to green fees and subscriptions. As Mr Mayes points out I would still expect the government to charge VAT on all the additional add ons such as food and beverage though. How can this be fair competition for golf clubs? We spend a lot of time and money getting visitors to the lovely setting that we are in, but trying to compete on price with all the other member owned golf clubs is very difficult. Governement seriously needs to think about this.

  • Seems total common sense to me. Golf course A charges Vat at 20% the club next door does not charge VAT, it can trade at 20% discount to the other, if they both offerred the same service it is a clear distortion of trade. When a HM spokesman cant see this it does not bode well for the future of our country. Golf clubs for profit v Golf clubs not for profit is another strange one, as the not for profit merely distrubute the profits via their membership as a thoretical dividend to keep the subsciption low. The goverment should allow ANY golf club the same taxes in order to trade on the same playing field. EGU membership should determine that golf clubs are the same regardless of ownership.

Use the buttons above to control the search results you want.

Prefixing a search term with a hyphen will exclude results matching that term.
For example 'green -greenkeeper' will return results containing 'green' but not 'greenkeeper'.